ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the influence of EMR and ESD of endoscopic surgery on perioperative clinical parameters, complete resection rate and complications of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of digestive tract. Methods 40 patients with neuroendocrine tumors of digestive tract were chosen from June 2009 to June 2016 and randomly divided into 2 groups: A group (20 patients) with EMR and B group (20 patients) with ESD; and the operation time, the treatment cost, the lesion size, the lesion thickness, the complete resection of tumor, the negative rate of vertical margin and the complication incidence of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time and the treatment cost of B group were significant better than A group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the lesion size and the lesion thickness between the two groups (P < 0.05). The completed resection rate of B group were significant higher than A group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the negative rate of vertical margin between the two groups (P < 0.05). The complication incidence of B group were significant higher than A group (P < 0.05). Conclusion EMR and ESD of endoscopic surgery in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of digestive tract possess the same clinical effects; EMR application can efficiently shorten the operation time and decrease the economic burden and ESD application maybe helpful to reduce the complication risk.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the influence of EMR and ESD of endoscopic surgery on perioperative clinical parameters, complete resection rate and complications of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of digestive tract. Methods 40 patients with neuroendocrine tumors of digestive tract were chosen from June 2009 to June 2016 and randomly divided into 2 groups: A group (20 patients) with EMR and B group (20 patients) with ESD; and the operation time, the treatment cost, the lesion size, the lesion thickness, the complete resection of tumor, the negative rate of vertical margin and the complication incidence of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time and the treatment cost of B group were significant better than A group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the lesion size and the lesion thickness between the two groups (P < 0.05). The completed resection rate of B group were significant higher than A group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the negative rate of vertical margin between the two groups (P < 0.05). The complication incidence of B group were significant higher than A group (P < 0.05). Conclusion EMR and ESD of endoscopic surgery in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of digestive tract possess the same clinical effects; EMR application can efficiently shorten the operation time and decrease the economic burden and ESD application maybe helpful to reduce the complication risk.